<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MERLOT Search - category=2216&amp;userId=399879&amp;nosearchlanguage=true</title>
        <link>http://www.merlot.org:80/merlot/</link>
        <description>A search of MERLOT materials</description>
        <copyright>Copyright 1997-2013 MERLOT. All rights reserved.</copyright>
        <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:40:06 PDT</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:40:06 PDT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <item>
            <title>State Capacity, Economic Crisis and Economic Reform: Implications for Sustainability</title>
            <link>http://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewMaterial.htm?id=554603</link>
            <description>Sustainability Seminar recorded on March 2, 2011, delivered by Georgetown University Professor George Shambaugh. Like the economic crises in Korea in 1997 and Argentina in 2001, U.S.  and European responses to the 2008-2011 financial crises are less about  what particular strategy is most likely to succeed or who specifically  will be bailed out, than they are about the capacity of national  governments to overhaul their economies and restore confidence in the  global markets. Whether adopting neo-Keynesian, monetarist, or  neo-liberal reforms or whether rescuing Wall Street or auto makers,  state capacity is essential. Enhanced capacity increases a  nation-state&apos;s ability to manage the market and has a significant  positive effect on the economy by decreasing uncertainty; thus enhancing  consumer and investor confidence. Low levels of state capacity compound  market uncertainty with political uncertainty. This weakens bargaining  strength and undermines confidence in both political leadership and the  economy. Understanding how the power of, and distribution of power  between, economic and political elites affects the capacity of national  governments to manage markets effectively (whether this involves  negotiating with labor unions, entrenched corporate and financial  groups, domestic and international investors, foreign governments, or  international financial institutions), enables us to predict recurring  patterns of political exuberance, economic exuberance, economic policy  inertia, and credible economic policy reform. These patterns of behavior  help to explain the evolution of national economic policies that  triggered economic crises in Asia and Latin America a decade ago and the  United States and Europe today. They have also shaped national  responses to these crises and, as a consequence, confidence in national  and global economies. </description>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
