Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Click here to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Click here to go to your Dashboard Report
Click here to go to your Content Builder
Click here to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
select OK to launch help window
cancel help

MERLOT II


    

Peer Review


Riemann Sum Applet

by David Eck
 

Ratings

Overall Rating:

3.33 stars
Content Quality: 3 stars
Effectiveness: 4 stars
Ease of Use: 4 stars
Reviewed: Feb 19, 2002 by Mathematics
Overview: This applet provides a visual representation of various techniques of numerical integration including left rectangle, right rectangle, midpoint (circumscribed and inscribed) and trapezoidal.

Please see A
Comparison of Numerical Integration Applets
in which seven such applets
from the MERLOT collection, including this one, are compared with regards
to their ease of use, effectiveness, and richness of features.  This
comparison also contains links to the applets? sites within the MERLOT
collection.
Learning Goals: The visual representation of the partitions and the corresponding sum of their areas approximates the area under a curve.
Target Student Population: First year calculus students.
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: A discussion of Riemann sums should go along with use of this applet
Type of Material: Simulation
Technical Requirements: JAVA supported web browser.

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 3 stars
Strengths: Numerical integration methods include left rectangle, right rectangle, midpoint, circumscribed rectangle, inscribed rectangle and trapezoid.
Five preset functions are provided, including a discontinuous one and one with an infinite limit. The user may create other functions and set the interval of integration.
Concerns: Simpson?s method is not included.
Problems arise whenever limits of integration are chosen outside the domain of the integrand.
The addition of an error estimate for each method of integration would facilitate comparison of the accuracy of each method, as well as the effect of changing the number of subintervals.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 4 stars
Strengths: The applet is effective in providing a visual representation of the method selected.
Concerns: The values of the various methods are not reported simultaneously, reducing the applet?s effectiveness as a tool to compare methods of integration.
The scale on the x- axis appears arbitrary and does not coordinate with the rectangles drawn. This is confusing to the user who has the impression that these values are important in the numerical integration process.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 4 stars
Strengths: The applet efficiently redraws the subintervals when a new method is selected. An error in syntax results in a message describing the correction necessary.
Concerns: The maximum and minimum y values are set manually and do not adjust automatically; consequently the function may not be visible in the window created by the x-interval selected.
Error messages associated with incorrect syntax are good, but an explanation of allowed syntax would be even better.