Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Click here to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Click here to go to your Dashboard Report
Click here to go to your Content Builder
Click here to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
select OK to launch help window
cancel help

MERLOT II


    

Peer Review


Surveys to Secondary Research

by Mary Ewald
 

Ratings

Overall Rating:

3.75 stars
Content Quality: 3.5 stars
Effectiveness: 3.75 stars
Ease of Use: 3.5 stars
Reviewed: Dec 03, 2013 by Business Editorial Board
Overview: “Surveys to Secondary Research” is an education site for students to learn how to look at materials, create a questionnaire, create a survey, and then publish and interpret the survey.
Learning Goals: Learning how to: • interpret materials viewed and then to create a relevant questionnaire concerning the material,then how • to narrow down the questionnaire to 10 questions, • create a survey using "Survey Monkey", • use “Create a Graph” and then publish the results using “Skype”.
Target Student Population: Students writing educational technology instructional design plans
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: Understanding of instructional design basics, primary and secondary research, surveys and second language learners
Type of Material: Tutorial
Recommended Uses: Individual use
Technical Requirements: A computer, internet connectivity, and knowledge/understanding about how to use: "Survey Monkey", "Create a Graph", "Skype", "Email", and "Google Docs".

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 3.5 stars
Strengths: • Good collection of materials. • Once mastered, the student will have a great understanding of how to create a survey and graph concerning the resultant materials. • Potential for great visuals.
Concerns: The plan needs to be edited for grammar and word usage. Too many elements - primary and secondary research, surveys and second language learners - are included causing confusion and lack of focus. Online portions seem to be thrown in to meet some other unstated objective.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 3.75 stars
Strengths: • The materials are relevant. • The materials help to guide students toward growth in the digital age. • The materials give the student the ability to use visuals that have not been readily available in the past.
Concerns: • Would not want to use it as an example because I wouldn't want my students to do something like this. The research problem, research question and the design plan seem to be muddled together. • The visuals are missing. It would be improved by including visual tutorials or interactive learning tools.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 3.5 stars
Strengths: • Learning materials are listed-great information. • Good referencing of ESL regulations. • Good site to reference training materials. • Links are provided for all programs utilized.
Concerns: • The learning materials and tools sited are not hyperlinked to. • This seems to read at a level that is above the 5th grade level. • No visual breaks-this is an 8 page, scroll down, file with only wording. There was nothing done to add color, visual stimulation, tables etc….

Other Issues and Comments: An instructional design plan from educational technology should have unique items designed by the writer, not just ways to tie in simple online software.