Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Click here to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Click here to go to your Dashboard Report
Click here to go to your Content Builder
Click here to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
select OK to launch help window
cancel help

MERLOT II


    

Peer Review


Historical Thinking Matters

by Center for History and New Media
 

Ratings

Overall Rating:

4.75 stars
Content Quality: 4.75 stars
Effectiveness: 4.75 stars
Ease of Use: 4.75 stars
Reviewed: Mar 31, 2014 by History Editorial Board
Overview: This site explores four key topics in US history teaching students how to critically interact with conflicting primary source material in order to construct a contextualized historical narrative. The site includes resources for both students and teachers The four topics are: the Spanish American war, Scopes Trial, the development of Social Security, and the life of Rosa Parks.
Learning Goals: • Students will begin to read documents historically, using strategies of contextualization, careful reading, and corroboration. • Students will expand critical thinking skills. • Students will demonstrate an understanding of the connections, causal and otherwise, between particular historical events, and larger social, economic, and political trends and developments.
Target Student Population: • AP High School History • College Lower Division • College Upper Division • General Education (Freshman Seminar)
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: None
Type of Material: Reference material
Recommended Uses: • In class discussion • Individual homework assignments • Small group discussion • Lecture support for teaching
Technical Requirements: Flash and HTML Reviewed on Chrome

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 4.75 stars
Strengths: • Well developed curriculum • Excellent video support • Excellent source material • Excellent assignments
Concerns: • The curriculum requires support from an outside textbook for background information. This is not a problem, but requires the teacher’s prior planning for integration.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 4.75 stars
Strengths: • Outstanding teacher resources and learning objectives. • Provides assignment and grading resources • Excellent tool for developing critical reading and contextualization skills.
Concerns: • Prerequisite information is assumed and not fully clear – a minor criticism.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 4.75 stars
Strengths: • Clean, clear, and easy to use
Concerns: • None

Other Issues and Comments: • Outstanding site!