Search all MERLOT
Click here to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Click here to go to your Dashboard Report
Click here to go to your Content Builder
Click here to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
select OK to launch help window
cancel help

MERLOT II




        

Search > Material Results >

Guiding Principles for Mathematics and Science Education Research

        

Guiding Principles for Mathematics and Science Education Research

Logo for Guiding Principles for Mathematics and Science Education Research
A June 21, 2000, NSF report on a workshop of science and math education researchers. The purpose of this report is to present a brief review of research methodsemployed in recent studies and to propose, for discussion purposes, anumber of guiding principles for designing research studies and evaluatingresearch proposals in the area of mathematics and science education. The guiding principles presented here are intended tohelp provide a common basis for reviewing many research proposals.
Material Type: Reference Material
Date Added to MERLOT: April 30, 2001
Date Modified in MERLOT: March 04, 2006
Author:
Send email to lsuter@nsf.gov

Quality

About

Primary Audience: College General Ed, Graduate School, Professional
Mobile Compatibility: Not specified at this time
Technical Requirements: Text document
Language: English
Cost Involved: no
Source Code Available: no
Accessiblity Information Available: no
Creative Commons: unsure

Connections



QR Code for this Page

Browse in Categories

Discussion

Discussion for Guiding Principles for Mathematics and Science Education Research

Log in to participate in the discussions or Register if you are not already a MERLOT member.

Return to Top of Page
Avatar for Teacher Education Editorial Board
12 years ago

Teacher Education Editorial Board (Faculty)

This item will be reviewed by the Teacher Education Editorial Review Board. 65

Avatar for Nancy J. Pelaez
13 years ago

Nancy J. Pelaez (Faculty)

We have a rubric for evaluating stages for research project proposals by Master
of Arts in Teaching Science candidates:
http://faculty.fullerton.edu/npelaez/sced55x/OralReport.htm I was concerned
that student researchers could get points for each item on the rubric, and yet
have a POOR proposal. This paper clarified the problem - and was helpful to
student researchers who struggle to allign some problem with a research question
or hypothesis and a method or design expected to lead to useful outcomes for
science education research.