Real Set Theory
Peer Review for material titled "Real Set Theory"
User Rating for material titled "Real Set Theory"
Member Comments for material titled "Real Set Theory"
Personal Collections for material titled "Real Set Theory"
Learning Exercises for material titled "Real Set Theory"
Accessibility Info for material titled "Real Set Theory"
Search all MERLOT
Click here to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Click here to go to your Dashboard Report
Click here to go to your Content Builder
Click here to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
select OK to launch help window
cancel help



Search > Material Results >

Real Set Theory


Real Set Theory

Logo for Real Set Theory
An axiomatic theory called Real Set Theory is defined in which Generalized Continuum Hypothesis and Axiom of Choice are theorems.
Material Type: Reference Material
Technical Format: PDF
Date Added to MERLOT: June 25, 2001
Date Modified in MERLOT: April 14, 2010
Submitter: Kannan Nambiar


  • Reviewed by members of Editorial board for inclusion in MERLOT.
    Editor Review (not reviewed)
  • User review 5 average rating
  • User Rating: 5 user rating
  • Discussion (1 Comment)
  • Learning Exercises (none)
  • Personal Collections (none)
  • Accessibility Info (none)


Primary Audience: College General Ed, Graduate School, Professional
Mobile Compatibility: Not specified at this time
Technical Requirements: AcrobatReader4
Language: English
Cost Involved: no
Source Code Available: no
Accessiblity Information Available: no
Creative Commons: unsure


QR Code for this Page

Browse in Categories


Discussion for Real Set Theory

Log in to participate in the discussions or Register if you are not already a MERLOT member.

Return to Top of Page
Avatar for Ben Flores
12 years ago

Ben Flores (Student)

I spend around 20 minutes reviewing the material, it is obvius to tecnical for
me but it really challenged me to study pure math depeer, eventually will be
able to figure out great portions of the notation and be able to see it easily
as the author mention when two or three times during his presentation. I almos
can feel the beauty of the disertation of the mathematitian, can feel the
weight of his logical arguments, but fail to complete my understanding, mainly
for the lack of Knowlege of notation.