a. How did you review the materials? (Did you spend 5 minutes browsing it or 2 hours trying it?) -------I reviewed the...
a. How did you review the materials? (Did you spend 5 minutes browsing it or 2 hours trying it?) -------I reviewed the material for about 30 minutes. b. The quality of content. (Do the materials accurately present concepts and models that are educationally significant?) -------The quality of content is phenomenal. It?s just like having another text book. The ideas, thoughts and concepts are portrayed in much the same manner that a text would; Although they are bit more selective and condensed I would imagine. This might be prove useful for anyone needing resources of research projects still. I found an interesting very helpful section on sleep, my topic). I stumbled across Lithium and the treatment of mania. The text didn?t elaborate very much on the topic, where the online site provided much more info.c. The potential effectiveness for enhancing teaching and learning. (If used appropriately, will students learning and faculty's teaching be enhanced?) ------This sight would prove very helpful in enhancing teaching and learning. Someone can click to the topic of interest.Technical Remarks: d. The ease of using the materials. (Will first time users find it easy to use?) -----Once again, everything is organized very well making it easy to identify what you are looking..