Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Select to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Select to go to your Dashboard Report
Select to go to your Content Builder
Select to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
Select OK to launch help window
Cancel help

MERLOT II

Advanced Search

    

Peer Review


Research Methods

by Barbra Bied Sperling
 

Ratings

Overall Numeric Rating:

5 stars
Content Quality: 5 stars
Effectiveness: 4 stars
Ease of Use: 4.5 stars
Reviewed: Jan 28, 2006 by Psychology
Overview: This site is a tutorial on research methods with examples pulled from
Psychology, Biology, Geology, and Sociology. It was created by individuals
within the Maricopa Community Collge system, especially those within theMaricopa
Center for Learning and Instruction. The site addresses the basics, strengths,
and limitations of the experimental, correlational, naturalistic observation,
survey, and case study methods.

Type of Material: This website is a tutorial on research methods utilizing Shockwave and including
the descriptions of five basic research methods (experiment, correlation,
naturalistic observation, survey, and case study) and examples of the methods
from four different disciplines (Psychology, Biology, Geology, and Sociology),
as well as practice and post-tests on identifying the methods, their strengths,
and their limitations.
Recommended Uses: This tutorial could be used as either an in- or out-of-class assignment or
review for introductory (or other undergraduate)students in psychology,
sociology, biology, or geology.
Technical Requirements: The only technical requirement for the tutorial to function properly is
Shockwave. The site contains a link to download Shockwave if needed.
Identify Major Learning Goals: The site seeks to provide the student with a basic understanding of the
experimental, correlational, naturalistic observation, survey, and case study
methods. After completing the tutorial, the student should be able to identify
examples of each of the methods, as well as their strengths and limitations.
Target Student Population: The target student populations are students in the introductory courses in
psychology, biology, geology, and gociology as well as undergraduate students in
these disciplines who need to review basic research methods.
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: None.

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 5 stars
Strengths: The content in this tutorial is of high quality. The descriptions of the
research methods (as well as their strengths and limitations) are well-written
and the examples used for each method are drawn from actual research studies.
Two examples are given for each discipline (psychology, sociology, biology,
geology) to illustrate the research methods.
Concerns: Minor concerns are: (1) the practice and post-test questions are not discipline
specific so that, for example, a psychology student who completed the tutorial
and read the examples dealing with psychological studies would have test
questions on research methods used, not only in psychology, but also in
sociology, biology, and geology; (2) some of the test questions dealing
with research method strengths and limitions can be confusing. For example, one
strength of several methods is that they can be used when it would be ethically
or practically unreasonable to use an experiment. In the practice and
post-tests on this site, however, this answer is considered correct for only one
particular research method; and (3) an opportunity for the student to explore
and learn more would be useful as the site presents material at a very basic
level.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 4 stars
Strengths: Often, research methods is a difficult topic for students to grasp, especially
as they are used within specific disciplines. This tutorial is a wonderful one
to help make the topic a little easier for students to understand. It is easy
to use; the site is clearly laid out with prominent navigational links. An
introduction is given examining the question "What is science all about anyway?"
Learning objectives are explicitly stated. The major research methods are
clearly described, even correlation. (There is a wonderful correlation meter!)
Practice and post-tests are useful teaching tools, because feedback for both
correct and incorrect answers are given in the practice tests and final scores
are given for the post-tests. The use of actual research studies (from the
various disciplines) to illustrate each research method is a particularly
effective teaching tool. Another nice feature (which may help students relate
to the material) is that upon entry into the lab, one can type in a name for a
personal welcome.
Concerns: If students are sent to this site as their sole exposure to research methods, it
may not be sufficient for complete understanding for all students. As a
supplement to other instruction, however, it is excellent (and for some
students, may be all that they need). There are some flaws in the testing. In
the identifying strengths practice quiz, for example, it is not possible to
determine if one's answers are correct or not. The lack of direct feedback in
the post-test is also a problem



Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 4.5 stars
Strengths: The tutorial is very easy to use and has a navigation button to click for help
in understanding the program.
Concerns: One concern is for students unfamiliar with Shockwave who will need to
download the software in order to use the tutorial. However, the site makes
this download easy by providing a link by which to obtain the multimedia player.
The problems noted with the quizzes interfere with the ease of use of the site.
In addition, the site is not
accessible.


Other Issues and Comments: Links are available to e-mail the creators of the website.