Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Select to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Select to go to your Dashboard Report
Select to go to your Content Builder
Select to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
Select OK to launch help window
Cancel help


Advanced Search


Peer Review


by Scott Barker


Overall Numeric Rating:

3.67 stars
Content Quality: 3 stars
Effectiveness: 4 stars
Ease of Use: 5 stars
Reviewed: May 02, 2001 by Health Sciences
Overview: This site is designed as a test for athletic training knowledge. There are a number of different areas covered and one takes each section separately. The material is very specific to athletic trainers.
Type of Material: This is a knowledge test.
Technical Requirements: The technical requirements are very simple. The site has a narrated walk-through to help in completing the tests. The student reads and then selects answers by clicking the chosen answer.
Identify Major Learning Goals: No specific learning goals are listed.
Target Student Population: The specific group is athletic trainers in high schools and colleges.
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: One would need specific training as an athletic trainer. The areas covered include professional development and responsibilities; risk management; pathology of injury; management skills and specific sports conditions.

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 3 stars
Strengths: There is rather broad coverage of several areas
Concerns: One can answer the sections, move to the next section and return to an earlier section when subsequent information is provided. This is a problem. Also, the exact method of grading is not clear. References for the answers are not provided.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 4 stars
Strengths: The student is provided immediate feed back concerning the score
Concerns: The student can take the same test over and over until the score is increased without increasing knowledge. I was able to move to near perfect scores in the sections with subsequent completion of the sections.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 5 stars
Strengths: No special abilities are required to use.
Concerns: The grading methods are not make clear.

Creative Commons:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States