Post a composite review
Unpost a composite review
Search all MERLOT
Select to go to your profile
Select to go to your workspace
Select to go to your Dashboard Report
Select to go to your Content Builder
Select to log out
Search Terms
Enter username
Enter password
Please give at least one keyword of at least three characters for the search to work with. The more keywords you give, the better the search will work for you.
Select OK to launch help window
Cancel help


Advanced Search


Peer Review

LIB 740- Plagiarism

by Unknown


Overall Numeric Rating:

4.25 stars
Content Quality: 4.25 stars
Effectiveness: 4 stars
Ease of Use: 4.25 starsstar
Reviewed: Apr 03, 2013 by Library and Information Services
Overview: A series of instructional web pages providing an overview of what is plagiarism, what constitutes plagiarism, and strategies for avoiding plagiarism. Complementing the instruction on plagiarism are links to an additional series of web pages providing information on citing sources.
Type of Material: Tutorial
Recommended Uses: This could be used in every English Composition class before starting and research paper. It would also be good good in library orientation sessions when teaching students about research skills.
Technical Requirements: Browser, HTML
Identify Major Learning Goals: The primary objective of the two instructional series is to familiarize students with the basic concepts, skills, and ethical issues related to plagiarism.
Target Student Population: high school students, undergraduate college students,students new to the research process.
Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills: None

Evaluation and Observation

Content Quality

Rating: 4.25 stars
Strengths: The series of instructional web pages clearly distinguishes between the common forms of plagiarism and ranks the “severity of intent” for each type. This tutorial is very clear and concise and completely tells all about plagiarism from what it is to ways to avoid it. It includes information from academic experts.
Concerns: As part of an analogy, the use of “Digital 2.0” monikers to label common forms of plagiarism could be potentially confusing to those unfamiliar with the nomenclature.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating: 4 stars
Strengths: Effectively identifies and discusses the various forms or types of plagiarism, in addition to providing links to instruction for concepts related to plagiarism (e.g., citing sources). This tutorial very efficiently teaches about plagiarism. A lot of information is in this resource, and it would be a great place for students to go to to learn about what plagiarism is and what citation is. It tells about 10 different types of plagiarism. Assignments could be easily made about the 10 types of plagiarism.
Concerns: Learning objectives are not identified and the instructional web pages provide no means by which students can check their understanding of concepts and/or apply what has been learned.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating: 4.25 stars
Strengths: The instructional components or parts are clearly identified and easily accessed.
Concerns: Navigating between the two instructional series (e.g., Plagiarism 101 and Citing Sources) using the embedded text links without opening in a new window was somewhat confusing. Specifically, accessing a web page in the Plagiarism 2.0 series, clicking on an embedded link, then clicking on a link to additional content listed on the left side of the Citing Sources web page, and then attempting to navigate back to the original Plagiarism 2.0 content page was not intuitive.

Creative Commons:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States