Learning Exercise
Investigate an Exoplanet: Measure a Transit Period with Real Kepler Data
Why does a star appear to dim at regular intervals? In this guided investigation, learners analyze actual NASA Kepler observations of the known TrES-2 system. They estimate an orbital period, compare phase-folded views, calculate a fractional light deficit and use a simple area model to estimate a planet-to-star radius ratio. Learners finish with an evidence-based explanation that distinguishes measured dimming from the additional evidence needed to confirm a planet. The activity supports individual work or pairs and includes an interactive lab, printable worksheet, educator notes and optional spreadsheet or Python extensions.
A guided investigation using actual NASA Kepler observations of TrES-2, an already known transiting planet system.... see more
Exercise
Open the Exoplanet Transit Lab:
https://darksciencedocs.com/light-lab/exoplanet-transits/
Use the printable worksheet under Teaching materials, or record your answers separately. You need a calculator with a square-root function. Leave the published-interpretation reveal closed until Step 5.
This activity revisits a known planet system. Your task is to investigate what the observations support and explain their limitations.
-
Predict from the full record
Choose Full record. Describe the recurring brightness dips and propose an explanation. Give one alternative explanation, such as an eclipsing binary or blended star. Write a prediction you can test using the spacing between dips.
-
Measure the repeating interval
Choose Stack transits. Select Dip 01 as A and Dip 14 as B. Record their times and the interval count.
Calculate:
Period in days = (time B − time A) / number of intervals.
Explain why 14 consecutive dips span 13 intervals. Press Stack selected dips and compare its timing estimate with your calculation.
Repeat with Dip 01 and Dip 02. Compare the two results and explain why rough timing estimates need not agree exactly.
-
Explain phase folding
Compare the stacked chart at a trial period of 2.40000 days with the view produced by your Dip 01-to-14 timing estimate.
Describe how the recurring dips align at the more suitable period. Explain what changes when the trial period changes and what stays the same.
Does stacking produce new observations or independently confirm a planet? Explain.
-
Estimate the light deficit and size ratio
Choose Inspect dip, select Dip 01 and set the inspection-center offset to 0.00 hours. Record the central and baseline sample counts and compare the readouts with the fixed Check this result example.
Use these normalized-flux medians from the reference example:
Central median: 0.9865704645.
Baseline median: 0.999985447.
Calculate:
Fractional light deficit = 1 − central median / baseline median.
Percentage light deficit = fractional light deficit × 100.
Approximate planet-to-star radius ratio = square root of the fractional light deficit.
Use the fractional value, rather than the percentage number, inside the square root. Explain why the percentage of light blocked differs from the radius ratio.
Move the inspection center slightly and describe how the estimate changes as different measurements enter the window. Does this mean the planet changed size? Give one assumption or limitation of the estimate.
-
Build an evidence-based explanation
Write a short paragraph containing:
• One claim about this record.
• Two numerical observations supporting it.
• One limitation and one alternative explanation.
• One additional observation that could help test the planet interpretation.
Then open Reveal the published interpretation. Compare your estimate with the published period and identify the additional evidence used in the original discovery study. Explain why this exercise does not independently confirm a planet.
What to submit
Submit your calculations, brief explanations and final evidence-based paragraph.
Optional extension
Reproduce the calculations in a spreadsheet using the downloadable data, or run the downloaded Python verification script. Describe what your chosen method checks and what it cannot establish.
Disciplines
Technical Notes
JavaScript is required for the interactive controls and graphs. Instructions, worked examples and data tables remain readable without JavaScript. Internet access is needed to open the website and download resources; downloaded worksheets and data can be used offline.
Chart descriptions and supporting data tables provide text alternatives to the visual plots. The printable PDF includes tagged headings, reading order, table headers and chart descriptions. For adjustable text and a reflowing layout, use the webpage; the PDF retains a fixed print layout.
Optional spreadsheet work uses CSV files. The optional verification script requires Python 3.9 or later, uses only the standard library and runs offline. It checks the supplied data and reference calculations; it does not fit a transit or independently confirm a planet.
Requirements
Learners should be able to read a basic graph and perform subtraction, division, percentages and square roots. No prior astronomy, programming or telescope experience is required.
The online activity requires a modern web browser with JavaScript enabled and an internet connection. A calculator with a square-root function is recommended. Downloaded worksheets and data can be used offline; the printable packet requires a PDF reader.
Spreadsheet software supporting CSV files or Python 3.9 or later is needed only for the optional extensions. The Python script uses only the standard library. No account or paid software is required.
Topics
Exoplanets; transit photometry; Kepler mission; light curves; orbital period; phase folding; transit depth; planet-to-star radius ratio; scientific evidence and uncertainty.
Type of Task
Learning Objectives
By the end of this exercise, learners will be able to:
-
Estimate an orbital period from recurring brightness dips by dividing elapsed time by the correct number of intervals.
-
Explain how phase folding rearranges existing observations without changing measured brightness or adding new data.
-
Calculate a fractional light deficit and estimate a planet-to-star radius ratio using the square-root relationship, while identifying its simplifying assumptions.
-
Construct a scientific explanation supported by two numerical observations, a limitation, an alternative explanation and a useful follow-up observation.
-
Distinguish transit-like dimming from the additional evidence needed to confirm a planet, recognizing that this activity reexamines an already established system.
Assessment
Assess the completed worksheet or equivalent written response using this suggested 10-point rubric:
-
Period calculation and interval counting — 2 points.
Correctly calculates an orbital period and explains why 14 consecutive dips span 13 intervals. -
Phase-folding explanation — 2 points.
Explains that folding rearranges the same observations without changing measured brightness, adding data or independently confirming a planet. -
Light deficit and radius ratio — 2 points.
Correctly calculates the fractional light deficit and approximate radius ratio, distinguishing fractions from percentages and identifying a simplifying assumption. -
Evidence-based claim — 2 points.
Presents a defensible claim supported by two relevant numerical observations. -
Limitations and further investigation — 2 points.
Identifies a relevant limitation, an alternative explanation and a useful follow-up observation.
Award partial credit within each category for sound reasoning despite minor arithmetic or wording errors. Accept sensible rounding; displayed decimal places do not indicate physical precision. Reward explanations supported by evidence.
Educator notes and worked answers are included in the downloadable teaching packet. Optional spreadsheet or Python extensions may be assessed separately.