Peer Review

• The models and results are vaild.
• The material is very flexible and easy to understand.
• It gives inputs and detailed overview of the material with charts and finding to test and upgrade learners’ knowledge.
• The design is modular and is very effective in multiple user groups.
• The content approach is appropriate for learners to understand the key facts about the case.
• Multiple aspects involved in developing another version of the Michael Jordan shoe are included, and the case demonstrates the integration of these aspects.
• A glossary of terms is provided.

• The educator copy requires a request and may take a few days to hear back with approval for the request.
• The reader can assume that the information is accurate based on some of the citations in the case, but there is no list of references.
• The restrictions on access to the educator copy also restrict how the case can be used.

• Learning objective(s) are provided at the beginning of the case.
• The relationship between the concepts is evident, and the complexity involved in the development process is demonstrated.
• Although there are limitations of how the case can be used based on the information on the website, parts of the case could be assigned as homework or for research purposes and then discussed in class.
• This is a very effective teaching tool the material is made in such a way that students and teachers can easily navigate and learn with given concepts and gets an idea about the case.
• This can be used as a real-world project.

It allows the learners and teachers to explore the key characteristics, meanings 0 and its implications in a realtime situation. It increases the learning potential as students get to understand the topic well. This helps to achieve the learning and teaching goals.

• Illustration of the concepts is needed
• Prerequisite knowledge is not identified. This would be up to the instructor to identify what is necessary and to match course requirements with the case.
• The instructor would need to reinforce the concepts depending on what the class needs. The case does not carry this information, but this may be available in the educator’s copy.
• If this is used to measure student learning outcomes, the instructor may need to develop a rubric or criteria because this information is not available in the inspection copy and it should be customized to the appropriate course, regardless.

• The material is very easy to navigate and it has a very nice layout,
• The case study uses very effective charts.
• The key concepts are explained well and students can recall the same easily,
• The case study can be downloaded and is in working order.
• It has the ability to engage the user from the start.
• The skepticism surrounding a “green” product highlights concerns of quality that students may not be aware of (such as customer perception) when considering sustainability.

• Instructions were not provided with this examination copy; as noted earlier, the educator’s copy must be requested and users must be vetted before being allowed to receive the educator’s copy.
• Instructors would need to develop interactive aspects of the case and customize it to their own course.
• Real-time examples can be used and it lacks in this material.
• Some graphical presentations are needed.
• Some of the calculations need to have some more clarifications. It needs to be more visually appealing.
• The quality of the design needs to be upgraded.
• The case study is designed in one way of thought process and it lacks diversity.