Peer Review

Pens & Pixels

Material Detail page

Reviewed:: Aug 28, 2024 by ICT Literacy

Bookmark

Ratings

Overall Rating:

Content Quality:

Effectiveness:

Ease of Use:

Overview:

Sponsored by the University of California, Irvine, and the Spencer Foundation, this website is a collection of curated resources on generative AI, including its integration in education.

Type of Material:

Learning Object Repository

Recommended Uses:

Choice website's topics to introduce in class and practice as homework

Technical Requirements:

works in Windows browsers

Identify Major Learning Goals:

Users will:

Discussions surrounding Generative AI in education and educational resources
Explore curated, creative resources for use in education and research

Target Student Population:

Professional, college students, Educators & Researchers

Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills:

basic ICT literacy

Content Quality

Rating:
Strengths:: This curated collection of resources on generative AI was produced by the University of Irvin. Materials are accurate, current, and relevant; both basic and advanced sources are provided. A resources list for educators and researchers ranges from general information to teacher tools and ethics. Self-contained, the collection may be used flexibly across disciplines. Links work and are attributed.
Concerns:: Because the reosurces are stand-alone and not interdependent, determining the adequate amount of information and its synthesis cannot be determined.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool

Rating:

Strengths:

The concepts reflect central ICT literacy standards. The website provides resources for basic and more advanced understanding ("deeper dive" section). The main topics relate to each other, although not explicitly. The various topics and related resources facilitate lesson and assignment planning. The generative AI resources and their use are applicable to academic and daily life.

Concerns:

Materials are not interdependent, so some knowledge gaps may exist. Furthermore, while the resources appear authoritative, they do differ in scope and approach.

Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty

Rating:
Strengths:: The website is clear, attractive and engaging. It is easy to navigate independently, and the technology is basic. While there is no help feature, users are encouraged to join their Discord conversation.
Concerns:: ADA-compliance is uneven: highest for website performance, and worst in mobile access. Resources vary in accessibility.

Other Issues and Comments:: Limited quantity of resources. A more robust list would be highly beneficial.
Creative Commons: