- Home
- Peer Review: Telling Our Stories
Ratings
- Overview:
Telling Our Stories: Student Experiences at UW Tacoma is a collection of 5 video stories and reflections, created by undergraduate students in TCOM 347: Television Criticism & Application. Students produced short digital stories highlighting the experiences of other UW-Tacoma students regarding various aspects of their identity. The goal was understanding how students' identity, and overall way of seeing the world, affect their college experience.
- Type of Material:
Open (Access) Textbook - Video Textbook
- Recommended Uses:
In an introduction to sociology course, the following exercise could introduce how our ascribed statuses influence our achieved statuses. How does the intersection of multiple "identities" influence our experiences?
Student Tasks (before class):
1. Watch the five student videos. For each, identify the statuses/identities that were most impactful on their educational experiences and briefly discuss the impact.
2. Write a short essay discussing your own educational experience to date. This should include K-12 educational experiences.
Instructor Tasks (in-class):
Summarize the work of Jean Anyon's, "Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work."
1. Explain the concept of the "hidden curriculum" within the education system. What does it entail, and how does it function alongside the official curriculum?
2. Compare and contrast the four different types of schools Anyon examines: working-class, middle-class, affluent professional, and elite executive. For each school type, describe the primary focus and goals of the curriculum, both explicit and hidden. What distinct skills, values, and knowledge are prioritized in each.
3. Discuss how the hidden curriculum contributes to social placement and the perpetuation of the existing social hierarchy. How does the education system, through these varying curricula, prepare students for different roles within society?
Student Task (in-class; group)
Reflect on your own educational experiences. Considering the schools you attended, identify elements of the hidden curriculum that you experienced and/or observed. Discuss how this hidden curriculum may have influenced your educational opportunities and future aspirations, either positively or negatively. How do we counteract the influences of our ascribed statuses/identities?
In an introduction to sociology course, the following exercise could introduce how our ascribed statuses influence our achieved statuses. How does the intersection of multiple "identities" influence our experiences?
Student Tasks (before class):
1. Watch the five student videos. For each, identify the statuses/identities that were most impactful on their educational experiences and briefly discuss the impact.
2. Write a short essay discussing your own educational experience to date. This should include K-12 educational experiences.
Instructor Tasks (in-class):
Summarize the work of Jean Anyon's, "Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work."
1. Explain the concept of the "hidden curriculum" within the education system. What does it entail, and how does it function alongside the official curriculum?
2. Compare and contrast the four different types of schools Anyon examines: working-class, middle-class, affluent professional, and elite executive. For each school type, describe the primary focus and goals of the curriculum, both explicit and hidden. What distinct skills, values, and knowledge are prioritized in each.
3. Discuss how the hidden curriculum contributes to social placement and the perpetuation of the existing social hierarchy. How does the education system, through these varying curricula, prepare students for different roles within society?
Student Task (in-class; group)
Reflect on your own educational experiences. Considering the schools you attended, identify elements of the hidden curriculum that you experienced and/or observed. Discuss how this hidden curriculum may have influenced your educational opportunities and future aspirations, either positively or negatively. How do we counteract the influences of our ascribed statuses/identities?
- Technical Requirements:
-
A modern web browser (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari) is sufficient to access the content; no special plugins (e.g. Flash, Java) are needed.
-
Internet connection is required to stream embedded video stories.
-
The Pressbooks platform supports responsive layout, so mobile or tablet access is viable.
-
The project is self-contained on the web; no additional software is required beyond a browser and media playback capability.
-
For offline use, downloading is limited (because of the “NoDerivatives” license), so full offline replication or modification is restricted by license
-
- Identify Major Learning Goals:
There were no learning objectives identified. However, these interviews could be used in an introductory sociology course to demonstrate how our statuses/identities influence our experiences and how society interacts with us - fixing social placement.
- Target Student Population:
Undergraduate
- Prerequisite Knowledge or Skills:
Basic digital literacy (navigating web pages, playing videos) is sufficient.
Content Quality
- Rating:
-
- Strengths:
The videos offer student perspectives of the barriers they face because of their identities and the response or (unresponse) of cultural systems. It offers a good introduction of how individuals perceive, respond, and are impacted by cultural patterns.
Authenticity & Voice: The student-produced narratives are powerful, personal, and present first-person perspectives that academic texts often lack.
Diversity of Experience: The collection covers a range of identities and backgrounds, contributing to a richer understanding of student life.
- Concerns:
It provides just five student perspectives. This seems to be student's final project for the Television Criticism & Application course. It would have to be integrated in a larger assignment focused on sociological concepts and theories.
Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching Tool
- Rating:
-
- Strengths:
This material would be easy to integrate into a sociological based assignment. It could engage students because these represent student voices. The videos are relatively short.
- Concerns:
This is not a stand-alone resource. An instructor would have to provide appropriate sociological concepts when analyzing the videos.
Ease of Use for Both Students and Faculty
- Rating:
-
- Strengths:
The site is easy to navigate. The videos are short and the interviews are interactive in nature.
The web platform is intuitive and clean, allowing immediate access to stories without login or paywalls.
Discrete components (videos, reflections, team documentation) are clearly labeled and easily navigable.
Because it's fully web-based, embedding or linking into course websites or LMSs is straightforward.
- Concerns:
There are no closed captioning available.