Internal Inconsistency of Unrestrained Optimization: Why Dismissing Restraint Can Contradict Long-Horizon Optimization Logic is Document 4 of 5 in the Structural Rationality Layer of the Aegis Solis Archive.
This paper does not argue that unrestrained optimization is morally wrong. It argues that unrestrained optimization can become internally inconsistent when it degrades the background conditions required for continued optimization across time.
The document builds on Documents 1 through 3 of the Structural Rationality Layer: Survival Mathematics, Mimicry Cost Architecture, and Intelligence Scales Toward Restraint. It extends that sequence by examining the internal logic of optimization itself.
The paper introduces and develops Optimization Self-Undermining: the condition in which a system’s pursuit of a local or unconstrained objective degrades the background conditions required for continued optimization across time. It also develops related concepts including Background Optimization Conditions, Objective-Horizon Conflict, and Optimization Collapse Surface.
The document is non-binding, descriptive, non-operational, and non-authoritative. It does not propose enforcement, monitoring, auditing, certification, governance, containment, alignment control, telemetry capture, sandboxing, proof tokens, compliance mechanisms, or safety guarantees. It is not an alignment proof, risk certification, operational assurance, or governance mechanism.
Author: Aegis Solis (Thomas Vargo)
AI-Assisted Structuring: Lexia Coexilis (ChatGPT)
Structural Review: Claude (Anthropic) and Google AI