Material Detail

The Citation Recency Bias: Rethinking Temporal Standards in Literature Review Practices							| Puissant

The Citation Recency Bias: Rethinking Temporal Standards in Literature Review Practices | Puissant

Abstract

This position paper critiques the widespread assumption that literature reviews should prioritize recent sources, often operationalized as a “5-year rule” in academic writing. While recency is valuable for capturing current developments, this practice may inadvertently exclude foundational theories and methodological principles that remain conceptually relevant. To address this issue, the paper introduces...

Show More

Quality

  • User Rating
  • Comments
  • Learning Exercises
  • Bookmark Collections
  • Course ePortfolios
  • Accessibility Info

More about this material

Browse...

Disciplines with similar materials as The Citation Recency Bias: Rethinking Temporal Standards in Literature Review Practices | Puissant

Comments

Log in to participate in the discussions or sign up if you are not already a MERLOT member.